4.5 Article

Sintering behavior of Ni-Zn ferrite powders prepared by molten-salt synthesis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED CERAMIC TECHNOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 2020-2032

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijac.13835

Keywords

molten-salt synthesis; Ni-Zn ferrite; powders; sintering behavior

Funding

  1. Central Universities in China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11674035, 61274015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The molten-salt synthesis method significantly reduces the synthesis temperature of Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 and increases its sintering activity, but may result in abnormal grain growth during sintering. The duration of calcination is a key factor affecting the activity and crystallization of the powders.
Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 powders were prepared by a novel molten-salt synthesis method. The effects of calcination processes of the powders on their sintering behaviors were investigated. Compared with the synthesis by traditional solid-state reaction, the proposed molten-salt method can significantly reduce the synthesis temperature of Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 from 800 to 550 degrees C below, and the prepared powders have relatively high sintering activity at low temperature, which can thus decrease the sintering temperature. However, the abnormal growth of grains is easy to occur during sintering, thus resulting in uneven grain size. In particular, during the molten-salt synthesis, the holding time for calcination is a dominant factor affecting the activity and crystallization degree of the resultant powders. From the point of view of increasing the density of sintered bodies, the optimal conditions for synthesizing Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 powder by the proposed molten-salt synthesis is 400 degrees C for 6 h. In addition, the saturate magnetization of the finally obtained ferrite ceramics has nothing to do with the preparation processes, while their coercivity depends on their densification and grain size caused by their different processing routes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available