4.6 Article

Adaptive anisotropic constitutive modeling of natural clays

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nag.3223

Keywords

anisotropy; clays; constitutive modeling; plasticity

Funding

  1. RFCS project MINRESCUE [RFCS-RPJ-899518]
  2. European Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an adaptive anisotropic constitutive model, AA1-CLAY, that can capture experimental yield points of different clay types with high accuracy. By incorporating an innovative rotational hardening rule, the model is able to control the yield surface rotation rate and realistically govern the effect of plastic strains at different constant stress ratios. The model's capabilities are demonstrated by comparing simulation results with experimental data for various clay types.
In this paper, an adaptive anisotropic constitutive model, namely AA1-CLAY, is developed for clays based on the critical state framework. The model has a non-associated flow rule, and it can also reduce to basic critical state constitutive models. A versatile yield surface (YS) is implemented in the model which can generate a broad range of shapes to improve the possibility of capturing experimental yield points of different clay types with high accuracy. In addition to the isotropic hardening rule, an innovative rotational hardening (RH) rule is also incorporated into the model to control the YS rotation rate. The proposed RH rule uses a transitional function to govern the effect of plastic strains at different constant stress ratios more realistically. Furthermore, the equilibrium state of anisotropy, which the YS tends to reach during plastic straining, is defined uniquely based on the experimental findings. The detailed model formulation is presented, and important features of the model are elaborately discussed. The capabilities of the model are also demonstrated by comparing the simulation results of several element tests on a number of different clays against the available experimental data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available