4.7 Article

An analytical fractal model for permeability in isotropic open-cell metal foam with surface roughness

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105473

Keywords

Permeability; Surface roughness; Fractal analysis; Open-cell metal foam; Direct numerical simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51976155, 12032010]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [xtr042019019]
  3. Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures [MCMS-E0219K02, MCMS-I-0219K01]
  4. K. C. Wong Education Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper develops a fractal model for estimating flow permeability of open-cell foam with rough surfaces, using fractal theory to characterize the randomness of pore distribution and micro roughness on metallic ligaments. The model is verified through comparison to experimental data and further explains the influence of micro-rods on permeability.
This paper develops analytically a fractal model for estimating flow permeability of open-cell foam with rough surfaces. Fractal theory is employed for better characterize the randomness of pore distribution in the porous media and for describing particularly the micro roughness on the metallic ligaments. This provides a closer look at the actual situation of pore distribution of open-cell foams. The permeability can mainly be expressed with porosity, average tortuosity, and micro-rods geometric parameters, without any empirical or fitting parameters. The analytical model is verified through comparison to existing experimental data. To further explain the influence of micro-rods on the permeability, a tetradecahedral unit cell is used for pore-scale simulation. It is found that the reduced permeability is caused mainly by the increased flow tortuosity and the surface friction between fluid transport and the micro roughness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available