4.4 Article

Changes in biomarkers after 180 days of tobacco heating product use: a randomised trial

Journal

INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages 2201-2212

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02798-6

Keywords

Cigarette smoking; Tobacco heating product; Biomarkers of exposure; Biomarkers of potential harm; Modified risk tobacco product

Funding

  1. British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that switching from smoking cigarettes to using a tobacco heating product resulted in reduced biomarkers of exposure and potential harm, indicating that completely switching to THPs may reduce the adverse health impacts of smoking.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether biomarkers of exposure (BoE) and potential harm (BoPH) are modified when smokers switch from smoking cigarettes to exclusive use of a tobacco heating product (THP) in an ambulatory setting. Participants in this randomised, controlled study were healthy volunteer smokers assigned either to continue smoking or switch to a THP, and a control group of smokers who abstained from cigarette smoking. Various BoE and BoPH related to oxidative stress, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and cancer were assessed at baseline and up to 180 days. In continuing smokers, BoE and BoPH remained stable between baseline and day 180, while THP users' levels of most BoE reduced significantly, becoming similar to those in controls abstaining from cigarette smoking. Also at 180 days, significant changes in numerous BoPH, including total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol, 8-epi-prostaglandin F2 alpha type III, fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide and white blood cell count, were directionally consistent with lessened health impact. Our findings support the notion that the deleterious health impacts of cigarette smoking may be reduced in smokers who completely switch to using THPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available