4.5 Article

Enhancing Cubes with Models to Describe Multidimensional Data

Journal

INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 31-48

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-021-10147-3

Keywords

OLAP; Models; Multidimensional data; Data exploration

Funding

  1. Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a di Bologna within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IAM is a new model paradigm that allows users to explore data by expressing analysis intentions and returns annotated multidimensional data. Research challenges include automatically tuning model size, estimating model component interestingness, selecting effective visualizations, and designing visual metaphors for interaction. Method effectiveness is evaluated based on user effort, efficiency, and scalability.
The Intentional Analytics Model (IAM) has been recently envisioned as a new paradigm to couple OLAP and analytics. It relies on two basic ideas: (i) letting the user explore data by expressing her analysis intentions rather than the data she needs, and (ii) returning enhanced cubes, i.e., multidimensional data annotated with knowledge insights in the form of interesting model components (e.g., clusters). In this paper we contribute to give a proof-of-concept for the IAM vision by delivering an end-to-end implementation of describe, one of the five intention operators introduced by IAM. Among the research challenges left open in IAM, those we address are (i) automatically tuning the size of models (e.g., the number of clusters), (ii) devising a measure to estimate the interestingness of model components, (iii) selecting the most effective chart or graph for visualizing each enhanced cube depending on its features, and (iv) devising a visual metaphor to display enhanced cubes and interact with them. We assess the validity of our approach in terms of user effort for formulating intentions, effectiveness, efficiency, and scalability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available