4.5 Article

Modeling spatiotemporal variability of the bioclimate envelope of Homarus americanus in the coastal waters of Maine and New Hampshire

Journal

FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 177, Issue -, Pages 137-152

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.01.010

Keywords

American lobster; Homarus americanus; Climate change; Habitat suitability index; Bioclimate envelope model

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF IGERT program
  2. NSF Coastal SEES program
  3. Maine Sea Grant College Program
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1325369, 1325484] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A bioclimate envelope model was developed to evaluate the potential impacts of climate variability on American lobster (Homarus americanus). Bioclimate envelopes were defined by season-, sex-, and stage-specific Habitat Suitability Indices (HSI) based on (1) bottom temperature, (2) bottom salinity, and (3) depth. The species' association to each of these three environmental attributes was expressed using Suitability Indices (SIs) calibrated by standardized lobster abundance derived from 14 years of fishery independent survey. A regional ocean model (Finite-Volume Community Ocean Model) was integrated with the HSI to hindcast spatiotemporal variability of bioclimate envelopes for American lobster in coastal waters of Maine and New Hampshire from 1978 to 2013. The model predictions indicated higher habitat suitability in inshore waters for both adult and juvenile lobsters. A statistically significant increasing trend in habitat suitability was observed for both sexes and stages (juvenile and adult) during the spring (April-June), while no significant trend in habitat suitability was observed in the fall (September-November). This study provides a modeling framework to reconstruct climatically suitable lobster ranges that can be used to formulate climate-based hypotheses for future studies of this species. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available