4.6 Article

In Situ Reduction of a CuO/ZnO/CeO2/ZrO2 Catalyst Washcoat Supported on Al2O3 Foam Ceramic by Glycerol for Methanol Steam Reforming in a Microreactor

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 25, Pages 8991-9001

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01180

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0310400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A CuO/ZnO/CeO2/ZrO2 catalyst slurry was prepared by mixing the catalyst powder, a polyvinyl alcohol aqueous solution, and glycerol. The catalyst was in situ reduced by glycerol during the loading process, leading to the integration of catalyst loading and reduction. The prepared catalyst showed excellent performance in methanol steam reforming with a high methanol conversion rate and hydrogen yield.
A CuO/ZnO/CeO2/ZrO2 catalyst slurry was prepared by mixing the catalyst powder, a polyvinyl alcohol aqueous solution, and glycerol. The slurry was coated on a Al2O3 foam ceramic support via a dip-coating method. The conventional prereduction treatment of a Cu-based catalyst by H-2 was replaced by in situ reduction of the catalyst by glycerol at a low temperature of 220 degrees C during the loading process, thus the integration of catalyst loading and reduction was achieved. The effects of the glycerol/catalyst weight ratio and the deposition number on the physicochemical properties of the prepared catalyst and the washcoat were systematically investigated. Results showed that the optimal glycerol/catalyst weight ratio led to a complete reduction of CuO with a small amount of residual carbon. A methanol steam reforming microreactor with the Al2O3 ceramic support prepared under an appropriate deposition number exhibited a 94% methanol conversion rate and a 0.15 mol/h H-2 yield at 360 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available