4.6 Article

Non-Isothermal Kinetic Model of Water Vapor Adsorption on a Desiccant Bed for Harvesting Water from Atmospheric Air

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 31, Pages 11812-11823

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01733

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, WATUSO [834134]
  2. long-term structural funding from the Flemish Government [METH/14/04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper developed a non-isothermal kinetic model to study the production of fresh water from atmospheric water vapor using desiccant pellets in a day-night cycle. The study found that factors like bed thickness and water vapor diffusion have impacts on the absorption efficiency.
Desiccants are used in the process industry for the drying of technical gases. An emerging application is fresh water production from the water vapor of atmospheric air using adsorbents in a day-night cycle. Water adsorption is performed at night and desorption using solar heat during the daytime. In this paper, a non-isothermal kinetic model of a packed bed of desiccant pellets is developed to determine possible uptake improvements by elucidating the complex mass- and heat-transfer interdependent resistances. Shallow beds thinner than 1 cm are required to handle bed diffusion and thermal conduction effects. Options for improvements regarding intragranular water vapor diffusion are limited. The adsorption process quickly becomes convection- and radiation-limited by the strong exothermicity of water adsorption. Steep parts in the water adsorption isotherm enhance the thermal effects. Water vapor supply by air convection is another factor limiting water uptake in real-world applications. The use of adsorbent particle beds is problematic for water-from-air production applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available