4.6 Article

Development of an Energy-Efficient Single Mixed Refrigerant Cycle for Small-Scale LNG Production

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 32, Pages 12049-12067

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c00432

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Mexican National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT) [460858]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper demonstrates that structurally modifying the configuration of SMR cycles can yield significant savings in shaft work demand with low added complexity, based on a case study for natural gas liquefaction at small scale. The results show that the novel SMR cycle achieves 10% savings in shaft work demand compared to the PRICO SMR cycle, showcasing its potential for enhancing energy efficiency in LNG production.
Energy-intensive single mixed refrigerant (SMR) cycles are employed to produce liquefied natural gas (LNG) at small scale. The energy required for refrigerant compression (shaft work) dominates the overall operating costs of the LNG plant. While current methods to minimize shaft work demand (e.g., exergy analysis) focus on the PRICO cycle, this paper shows that structurally modifying the configuration of SMR cycles can yield significant savings in shaft work demand with low added complexity. The novel SMR cycle developed in this work is based on the CryoMan SMR cycle; its benefits, in terms of energy savings, are demonstrated through a case study for natural gas liquefaction at small scale. The shaft work demand of the PRICO, CryoMan, and novel SMR cycles are minimized using a genetic algorithm and nonlinear optimization. The structural modifications applied tailor the refrigerant composition and exploit complex trade-offs between the operating variables to enhance the energy efficiency of the SMR cycles. The results from the case study demonstrate that the novel SMR cycle achieves 10% savings in shaft work demand in comparison with the PRICO SMR cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available