4.6 Article

Development of PdCu Structured Catalysts Based on ZrO2-CeO2 Materials Supported on Cordierite Monoliths for Water Remediation: Removal of Hazardous Oxyanions

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 34, Pages 12767-12775

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01784

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UNLP [X802]
  2. ANPCyT [PICT 2019-01668]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the removal of hazardous oxyanions NO3-, NO2-, and BrO3- using novel PdCu/10ZrCe structured catalysts supported on cordierite monoliths. The catalyst showed good activity and selectivity in synthetic water, but lower activity in real water samples due to competition for active sites by different ions. The structured catalyst has potential for developing a system for water remediation based on PdCu/ZrO2-CeO2 materials.
The elimination of hazardous oxyanions NO3-, NO2-, and BrO3- from synthetic and real water samples using novel PdCu/10ZrCe (10 wt % ZrO2 on CeO2) structured catalysts supported on cordierite monoliths was studied in order to avoid loss of the catalytic material during water treatment. The monoliths were coated with different suspensions of the 10ZrCe support. Particle sizes, suspension concentration of 10ZrCe, and pH effects were evaluated. The structured catalyst was tested in a fixed-bed reactor at different flow rates for the elimination of the selected anions. Good results in terms of activity and selectivity to the products of interest (S-N2: 0.99 and SBr-:1) were obtained in synthetic water. The structured catalyst was reused three times, maintaining its activity and selectivity. It was evaluated in a real water sample but the activity was lower probably due to competition for active sites by different ions present in the sample. The structured catalyst prepared is promising for the development of a system for water remediation, based on PdCu/ZrO2-CeO2 materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available