4.2 Review

Recommendations for the future of recreational fisheries to prepare the social-ecological system to cope with change

Journal

FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3-4, Pages 177-186

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/fme.12191

Keywords

adaptation; angling; human dimensions; invasive species; resilience

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (FNDE)
  2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
  3. Fundacao de Amparoa Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  4. International Game Fishing Association (IGFA)
  5. Fish TV
  6. SANASA-Campinas
  7. PESCARTE
  8. Federacao de Pesca Esportiva
  9. Turistica e Ambiental de Sao Paulo
  10. Prefeitura Municipal de Campinas
  11. Rede Anhanguera de Comunicacao
  12. Kalua Barco Hotel
  13. PESCAVENTURA
  14. Jair Rigotti Eventos e Promocoes
  15. Campinas Visitors Bureau

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents conclusions and recommendations that emerged from the 7th World Recreational Fishing Conference (WRFC) held in Campinas, Brazil in September 2014. Based on the recognition of the immense social and economic importance of recreational fisheries coupled with weaknesses in robust information about these fisheries in many areas of the world, particularly in many economies in transition, it is recommended to increase effort to build effective governance arrangements and improve monitoring and assessment frameworks in data-poor situations. Moreover, there is a need to increase interdisciplinary studies that will foster a systematic understanding of recreational fisheries as complex adaptive social-ecological systems. To promote sustainable recreational fisheries on a global scale, it is recommended the detailed suggestions for governance and management outlined in the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries: Recreational Fisheries are followed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available