4.4 Article

TREC/KREC levels in children with ataxia-telangiectasia

Journal

IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages 436-444

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12026-021-09216-1

Keywords

Ataxia-telangiectasia; TREC; KREC; Diagnosis; Newborn screening

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health of Ukraine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to determine TREC/KREC levels in patients with AT for early diagnosis. It found that TREC and KREC levels were significantly lower in AT patients, with a positive correlation between TREC levels and CD4 absolute values. This suggests that measuring TREC/KREC levels could facilitate early detection of AT and improve patient outcomes.
The aim of the study was to determine the TREC/KREC levels in the patients diagnosed with ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) and to establish their informative value for early diagnosis of this pathology. TRECs and KREC assay was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction on the DNA of 25 patients diagnosed with AT aged 3 to 14 years and of 173 healthy individuals of the control group aged 1 to 12 years. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients were ascertained using their medical records. In the patients with AT, the mean level of TRECs was 542.84 per 10(6) cells, ranging from 4 to 4720, while mean level of KRECs was 1317.64 per 10(6) cells, ranging from 146 to 9300. In 84% of the patients, TREC levels were less than 1000, which was significantly lower than in the control group, while KREC levels were reduced in 48% of the patients. A correlation was found between the levels of TREC and the absolute values of CD4 (r = 0.5455). Measurement of TREC/KREC levels opens new opportunities for early AT detection in children as a part of the newborn screening. Reduced time to diagnosis will allow to carry out timely in-depth immunological and genetic testing, prevent the development of severe infections, and improve quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available