4.5 Article

Reduced Gaussian process regression based random forest approach for fault diagnosis of wind energy conversion systems

Journal

IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages 3612-3621

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/rpg2.12255

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Qatar National Research Fund [NPRP9-3302-140]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel Reduced Gaussian Process Regression (RGPR)-based Random Forest (RF) technique for fault detection and diagnosis of wind energy conversion (WEC) systems. The method reduces computation burden, boosts classification speed and accuracy, and demonstrates effectiveness and robustness in fault detection in WEC systems.
This paper proposes a novel Reduced Gaussian Process Regression (RGPR)-based Random Forest (RF) technique (RGPR-RF) for fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) of wind energy conversion (WEC) systems. First, two RGPR models are proposed to deal with WEC features extraction and selection. The proposed RGPR models extract the most relevant information from the WEC system data while reducing the computation burden compared to the classical GPR model. The complexity reduction is ensured by the selection of the most effective samples through the dimensionality reduction (DR) metrics including Hierarchical K-means (HKmeans) clustering and Euclidean distance (ED). Next, in order to classify the WEC faults and improve the diagnosis abilities, RF classifier is developed. The proposed RGPRHKmeans-RF and RGPRED-RF techniques boost the classification speed and accuracy using a reduced number of features where only the most relevant and sensitive characteristics are kept in case of redundancy. The open-circuit, wear-out, and short-circuit are the three transistor faults considered in order to illustrate the effectiveness and robustness of the developed techniques. The obtained results show that the proposed RGPR-RF technique is characterized by a low computation time and high diagnosis accuracy (an average accuracy of 99.9%) compared to the conventional RF classifiers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available