4.5 Article

Uncertain accessibility estimation method for offshore wind farm based on multi-step probabilistic wave forecasting

Journal

IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages 2944-2955

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/rpg2.12227

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFE0104800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1765104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an uncertain accessibility estimation method based on a multi-step probabilistic wave height forecasting model and Monte Carlo simulation, which can improve the accuracy and efficiency of offshore wind farm O&M decision-making.
Accessibility estimation is significant to the offshore wind farm operation and maintenance (O&M) due to the extremely limited weather window and its sensitive effects on O&M tasks. Wave forecasting can be one solution to help maintenance decision-making. However, the uncertain and dynamic properties of wave forecasts are seldom considered in the accessibility estimation process. This paper presents an uncertain accessibility estimation method based on a multi-step probabilistic wave height forecasting (MPWHF) model and Monte Carlo simulation. First, an MPWHF model is proposed using the wavelet decomposition and the sequence to sequence (Seq2Seq) network with quantile outputs. Second, the O&M missions are randomly given a start time and simulated in the O&M flow chart by the Monte Carlo method. Finally, several access indexes, including accessibility probability, delay time, and delay probability, are evaluated based on the simulation results. Verification of the proposed MPWHF model and uncertain accessibility estimation is based on 7-year observation data of a buoy station. The results show that the MPWHF model outperforms other counterparts and the probability of offshore accessibility is nonlinearly dependent on the weather limits and the O&M required time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available