4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Path Following of Wheeled Mobile Robots Using Online-Optimization-Based Guidance Vector Field

Journal

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 1737-1744

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2021.3077911

Keywords

Mobile robots; Optimization; Robot kinematics; Encoding; Task analysis; Target tracking; Friction; Contraction; guidance vector field (GVF); nonholonomic constraint; optimization; path following; wheeled mobile robots

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61973272, 61872318]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates a path-following problem for a wheeled mobile robot with nonholonomic constraints. An online optimization procedure is used to estimate path error, while a nonlinear controller is developed to track a defined guidance vector field (GVF). Experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed control design.
This article studies a path-following problem for a wheeled mobile robot with nonholonomic constraints. The path-following task is represented by a guidance vector field (GVF), for which an online optimization procedure is adopted to estimate the path error. By exploiting a matrix-measure-based contraction principle, the convergence property of the designed GVF with respect to the task path is theoretically guaranteed. Then, a nonlinear controller is developed to track the defined GVF such that the target path is followed by the controlled mobile robot in the presence of unknown disturbances, including the unmodeled dynamics and the surface friction. Robustness properties of the closed-loop system are analyzed, and it is shown that the path error eventually converges to a residual set, which can be reduced by increasing control gains. Experiments are provided to validate the effectiveness of the desired GVF and the proposed control design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available