4.6 Article

On the Depth-Dependent Accuracy of Plane-Wave-Based Vector Velocity Measurements With Linear Arrays

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3076284

Keywords

Doppler effect; Velocity measurement; Lenses; Acoustics; Probes; Kernel; Imaging; Deep vessels; high-frame-rate imaging; plane waves (PWs); pulsed wave Doppler; spectral Doppler (SD) analysis; vector flow imaging (VFI)

Funding

  1. ECSEL Joint Undertaking [H2020-ECSEL-2019-IA-876190]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines the impact of high-frame-rate vector Doppler methods on velocity measurement accuracy at different depths, revealing trends such as lower errors for flat profiles and the significant influence of beam divergence on velocity measurements.
High-frame-rate vector Doppler methods are used to measure blood velocities over large 2-D regions, but their accuracy is often estimated over a short range of depths. This article thoroughly examines the dependence of velocity measurement accuracy on the target position. Simulations were carried out on flat and parabolic flow profiles, for different Doppler angles, and considering a 2-D vector flow imaging (2-D VFI) method based on plane wave transmission and speckle tracking. The results were also compared with those obtained by the reference spectral Doppler (SD) method. Although, as expected, the bias and standard deviation generally tend to worsen at increasing depths, the measurements also show the following. First, the errors are much lower for the flat profile (from approximate to -4 +/- 3% at 20 mm to approximate to -17 +/- 4% at 100 mm) than for the parabolic profile (from approximate to -4 +/- 3% to approximate to -38 +/-%). Second, only part of the relative estimation error is related to the inherent low resolution of the 2-D VFI method. For example, even for SD, the error bias increases (on average) from -0.7% (20 mm) to -17% (60 mm) up to -26% (100 mm). Third, conversely, the beam divergence associated with the linear array acoustic lens was found to have a great impact on the velocity measurements. By simply removing such lens, the average bias for 2-D VFI at 60 and 100 mm dropped down to -9.4% and -19.4%, respectively. In conclusion, the results indicate that the transmission beam broadening on the elevation plane, which is not limited by reception dynamic focusing, is the main cause of velocity underestimation in the presence of high spatial gradients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available