4.6 Article

Optimal Transmission Line Coupling Generation System Design for Rural Electrification

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 1964-1973

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3017376

Keywords

Wires; Conductors; Power transmission lines; Mathematical model; Capacitance; Inductors; Poles and towers; Energy harvesting; genetic algorithms; optimization; power tap

Funding

  1. CAPES [001]
  2. CNPq
  3. FAPESP [2017/20010-1, 2015/26096-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a mathematical model solved with genetic algorithm to design a collector system with optimized induced voltage and minimized project cost for a non-conventional distributed generation system. The trade-off between objectives and the Pareto optimal solutions were evidenced through several simulations.
An electric potential appears at floating wires located within a strong electric field. This phenomenon can be used to supply small isolated communities situated close to Extra-High Voltage transmission lines. This non-conventional distributed generation system has been studied for the last years. However, to improve the power generation system the optimal position of the floating wires, number of wires used, bundle radius, and type of wires must be properly identified. This paper presents a mathematical model solved with genetic algorithm to design a collector system with optimized induced voltage and minimized project cost, identifying the optimal reactor used for voltage regulation. The algorithm was applied to design a collector system that can tap-off 100 kW from a 230 kV transmission line. The trade-off between objectives and the Pareto optimal solutions were evidenced via several simulations using the weighting sum approach. These results allowed to identify a final geometry according to a-posteriori designer preferences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available