4.5 Article

Evaluating Load Balancing Performance in Distributed Storage With Redundancy

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages 3623-3644

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2021.3054385

Keywords

Load balancing; distributed storage; redundant storage; distributed systems

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CIF-1717314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that the load balancing performance in storage schemes of distributed systems exhibits different growth patterns under different conditions, and as the number of storage nodes increases, load balance may increase exponentially or multiplicatively.
To facilitate load balancing, distributed systems store data redundantly. We evaluate the load balancing performance of storage schemes in which each object is stored at d different nodes, and each node stores the same number of objects. In our model, the load offered for the objects is sampled uniformly at random from all the load vectors with a fixed cumulative value. We find that the load balance in a system of n nodes improves multiplicatively with d as long as d = o (log(n)), and improves exponentially once d = Theta(log(n)). We show that the load balance improves in the same way with d when the service choices are created with XOR's of r objects rather than object replicas. In such redundancy schemes, storage overhead is reduced multiplicatively by r. However, recovery of an object requires downloading content from r nodes. At the same time, the load balance increases additively by r. We express the system's load balance in terms of the maximal spacing or maximum of d consecutive spacings between the ordered statistics of uniform random variables. Using this connection and the limit results on the maximal d-spacings, we derive our main results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available