4.8 Article

A Tighter Exact Convex Modeling for Improved LMI-Based Nonlinear System Analysis and Design

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 2819-2824

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3005345

Keywords

Nonlinear systems; Lyapunov methods; Observers; Biological system modeling; Analytical models; Trajectory; Linear matrix inequalities; Linear matrix inequalities; lyapunov methods; takagi-sugeno model

Funding

  1. ECOS Nord -SEP CONACYT ANUIES Project Mexico [291309]
  2. International Campus on Safety and Intermodality in Transportation
  3. Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region
  4. European Community
  5. Regional Delegation for Research and Technology
  6. French Ministry of Higher Education and Research
  7. National Center for Scientific Research
  8. ECOS Nord -SEP CONACYT ANUIES Project France [M17M08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a novel methodology for exact convex rewriting of nonlinear systems, which can enhance the capabilities of control systems research based on polytopes and the direct Lyapunov method. By tighter fitting of interdependent nonlinearities, it effectively improves the feasibility of analysis and design while maintaining conditions in the form of linear matrix inequalities.
This article presents a novel methodology for exact convex rewriting of nonlinear systems that generalizes the well-known sector nonlinearity approach; it allows improving the capabilities of those methodologies based on polytopes and the direct Lyapunov method, which are still an active research area of fuzzy control systems. Depending on the computational burden, a tighter fitting of interdependent nonlinearities allows avoiding useless or damaging vertices, thus remarkably improving the feasibility chances of analysis and design, while preserving conditions in the form of linear matrix inequalities. A variety of examples give account of the advantages of the proposal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available