4.6 Article

Analysis and Compact Modeling of Fast Detrapping From Bandgap-Engineered Tunneling Oxide in 3-D NAND Flash Memories

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
Volume 68, Issue 7, Pages 3339-3345

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2021.3077202

Keywords

Electron traps; Tunneling; Solid modeling; Mathematical model; Photonic band gap; Logic gates; Analytical models; 3-D NAND flash memories; bandgap engineering; compact modeling; detrapping mechanism; short-term retention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of fast electron detrapping from BE-TOX in 3-D NAND flash memories and develops a physics-based detrapping model. By comparing the model result with a fitted function, several indicators of retention characteristics are correlated with the major paths of charge loss. The model facilitates the quantitative separation of the detrapping mechanism into different paths.
We present the comprehensive analysis and the compact modeling methodology of fast electron detrapping from the bandgap engineered tunneling oxide (BE-TOX) in 3-D NAND flash memories. To this end, we develop a physics-based detrapping model considering the detailed electron dynamics in the BE-TOX and various emission paths of the detrapping mechanism. By the aid of the carrier density rates from the accurately calibrated model, we find that the major path of the charge loss can be direct tunneling (DT) or trap-to-band tunneling (TBT) depending on the temperature and the nitride layer position in the BE-TOX. In addition, we compare the model result and the fitted stretched exponential function. From those comparisons, we correlate several indicators (time constant and curve shape) of the retention characteristics with the major paths of the charge loss. Finally, our model facilitates the quantitative separation of the detrapping mechanism into different paths.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available