4.5 Article

A Cost-Effective TSV Repair Architecture for Clustered Faults in 3-D IC

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCAD.2020.3025169

Keywords

Through-silicon vias; Maintenance engineering; Computer architecture; Circuit faults; Time division multiple access; Routing; Registers; 3-D integrated circuit (3D IC); honeycomb; through-silicon via (TSV); TDMA; yield

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61904001, 61904047, 61974001, 61704001, 61874156, 61674048, 61834006]
  2. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1908085QF272]
  3. Key projects of Natural Science Research of Universities in Anhui Province [KJ2019A0163]
  4. Anhui Polytechnic University Research Startup Foundation [2018YQQ007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proposed honeycomb-TDMA TSV design addresses the issue of TSV defect clustering, significantly reducing yield loss while also reducing additional hardware overhead and timing delays. This design outperforms other methods such as router-based, ring-based, group-based, cellular-based, and honeycomb-based methods in terms of yield, hardware overhead, and timing delay reduction.
Due to the winding level of the thinned wafers and the surface roughness of silicon dies, the through-silicon vias (TSVs) defect tend to be clustered, reducing the yield of 3-D integrated circuit significantly. To tackle this fault clustering problem, the existing TSV repair methods adopt the TSV redundancy idea, which brings a major cost to 3-D integration. In this brief, a honeycomb-TDMA TSV design is proposed to mitigate the impact of multiple clustered faults without the need of redundant TSVs (RTSVs), thereby decreasing the area overhead and enhances the yield. The yield of the honeycomb-TDMA architecture can achieve 91.38%-99.67% for different benchmark circuits from IWLS 2005, which has the highest yield. Furthermore, our design achieves total additional hardware (timing delay overhead) reduction by 83.70%-86.85% (46.01%-55.96%), 66.89%-73.25% (29.41%-38.49%), 68.02%-74.20% (41.40%-52.20%), 60.60%-68.18% (18.09%-33.18%), and 75.86%-80.52% (3.05%-20.91%), respectively, compared with router-based, ring-based, group-based, cellular-based, and honeycomb-based methods. Therefore, the proposed architecture is the best choice in terms of yields, hardware overhead, and timing delay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available