4.7 Article

Variable Selection According to Goodness of Fit in Nonparametric Nonlinear System Identification

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
Volume 66, Issue 7, Pages 3184-3196

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2020.3015744

Keywords

Input variables; Nonlinear systems; Kernel; Hilbert space; Machine learning; Sensitivity; Genomics; Nonlinear identification; nonparametric systems; reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS); variable selection

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CNS-1239509]
  2. Chinese Natural Science Foundation [11632011, 11702171, 51121063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to achieve a parsimonious model, it is important to rank input variables based on goodness of fit in nonlinear and nonparametric system identification. By establishing numerical algorithms in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space, it is possible to address the nonparametric nature of the unknown system and unknown distribution conditions successfully.
To achieve a parsimonious model, it is necessary to rank the importance of input variables according to some measures. The problem is nontrivial in the setting of nonlinear and nonparametric system identification. Difficulties lie in the lack of structural information of the unknown system, unknown underlying probabilistic distributions, and unknown nonlinear correlations of variables. In this article, we present a way to rank variables according to goodness of fit (GoF). Asymptotic results are established, and numerical algorithms are proposed. The problem is cast in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) that allows us to deal with nonparametric nature of the unknown system, to avoid making strong conditions on the unknown distributions, to link GoFs to computable conditional covariance operators on RKHS, and to develop computationally friendly numerical algorithms. Numerical simulations support the theoretical developments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available