4.4 Article

Design and Performance Analysis of Hexagonal Transmon Qubit in a Superconducting Circuit

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2021.3070469

Keywords

Transmon; black-box quantization; circuit QED; superconducting CPW resonator

Funding

  1. Samsung Electronics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Superconducting quantum bits are seen as promising candidates for quantum information processing platforms, requiring scalable designs and long qubit lifetimes for practical quantum computing devices. This paper presents simulation results of a hexagonal transmon qubit in a superconducting coplanar waveguide resonator, evaluating its performance in a practical sense with finite-element method simulations considering dielectric and TLS losses. Key parameters of qubits in superconducting circuits are estimated using the black-box quantization method or solving cQED, suggesting geometric features and key parameters for typical quantum information processing applications.
Superconducting quantum bits (qubits) are considered as promising candidates to serve as a platform for a quantum information processor. For the realization of practical quantum computing devices, scalable designs and long lifetimes of qubits are required. In this paper, we present simulation results of hexagonal transmon qubit in a superconducting coplanar waveguide (CPW) resonator. We conducted finite-element method simulations considering dielectric losses including the two-level system (TLS) loss to evaluate the performance of the qubit in a practical sense. Then, key parameters of a qubit in superconducting circuits - including lifetime, coupling strength, and energy levels are estimated by the black-box quantization method or by solving circuit quantum-electrodynamics (cQED). Finally, the geometric features and key parameters of the qubit are suggested for typical quantum information processing applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available