4.7 Article

Characteristic Mode Inspired Dual-Polarized Double-Layer Metasurface Lens

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 3144-3154

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2020.3046423

Keywords

Antenna; characteristic mode analysis (CMA); dual-polarization; lens; metasurface

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China [2242020R10035]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [62001102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a dual-polarized double-layer metasurface lens using split dipole unit cells. It achieves a wide phase range and high transmission coefficient amplitude, performing well in experimental verification at 30 GHz.
In the following, we propose a dual-polarized double-layer metasurface lens based on split dipole unit cells. The characteristic mode analysis (CMA) of a split electric dipole shows two characteristic modes over the band of interest. By exciting these two modes with a certain phase difference, the reflection at normal incidence can be canceled. Inspired by this idea, a planar dual-polarized unit cell based on four pairs of split electric dipoles is designed on a single-layer substrate. A phase range of 396 degrees and a transmission coefficient with a magnitude higher than 0.8 are achieved. For experimental verification, a metasurface lens with 36 x 36 elements is designed at 30 GHz with a focal diameter ratio of 0.84. The measured peak gain is 31.6 dBi at 31 GHz with an aperture efficiency of 45% and 1 dB/3 dB gain bandwidth of 7.3%/14%, respectively. Due to the dual-polarized operation, the relative high aperture efficiency, and the low-cost design, the proposed metasurface lens is a promising candidate for millimeter-wave communication, e.g., 5G and satellite communication systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available