4.6 Article

Space-Time Line Code for Enhancing Physical Layer Security of Multiuser MIMO Uplink Transmission

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 3336-3347

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2020.3001068

Keywords

MIMO communication; Antennas; Channel estimation; Receivers; Uplink; Fading channels; Transmitters; Artificial noise; noncoherent detection; secrecy rate; space-time line code

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korea government [2018R1A4A1023826]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates a secure uplink multiple-input multiple-output communication system, proposes a secure multiple access method, extends the secure STLC scheme from single-antenna to two-antenna users, and achieves full spatial diversity.
In this article, we investigate a secure uplink multiple-input multiple-output communication system, in which the multiple users transmit information to a legitimate access point (AP) when a passive eavesdropper exists. A secure multiple access method is proposed for single-antenna users by employing space-time line codes (STLCs), which enables noncoherent detection at the legitimate AP without channel state information (CSI) and achieves full spatial diversity. While extending the secure STLC scheme from the single-antenna to two-antenna users by combining the STLC with artificial noise (AN) injection, we design a low-complexity AN signals with the optimal power control scheme. The proposed AN is ensured to be eliminated after STLC decoding at the legitimate AP, while sustained in eavesdropper's received signals as interference. Theoretical sum secrecy rates are derived by considering time-varying fading channels with the uncertainty of CSI at the users, and the numerical results verify that the proposed STLC schemes outperform the existing secure transmission schemes in terms of the sum secrecy rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available