4.5 Article

Fabrication-Tolerant Design for High-Power, Single-Lobe, Surface-Emitting Quantum Cascade Lasers

Journal

IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 33, Issue 16, Pages 820-823

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LPT.2021.3074330

Keywords

Quantum cascade lasers; surface-emitting lasers

Funding

  1. Navy [N68335-19-C-0261]
  2. Intraband, LLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grating-coupled, surface-emitting quantum-cascade lasers of linear geometry generally operate in an antisymmetric mode, which can be suppressed by designing gratings favoring symmetric-mode operation or having a central pi-phaseshift. Simulations and analysis show that the latter design has higher fabrication tolerance and can operate in a single-lobe beam pattern up to 0.63 W CW.
Grating-coupled, surface-emitting (GCSE) quantum-cascade lasers (QCLs) of linear geometry generally operate in an antisymmetric mode, which is undesirable due to its double-lobed far-field beam pattern. The antisymmetric mode can be suppressed by designing 2nd-order metal/semiconductor gratings that favor symmetric-mode operation, but using such an approach requires tight tolerances in grating duty cycle that impair fabrication yields. Alternatively, the grating can be designed to favor antisymmetric-mode operation with single-lobe emission by using a central pi-phaseshift. Here we show that such a design is highly fabrication tolerant. Simulations using COMSOL Multiphysics are performed followed by finite-length analysis using coupled-mode theory and the transfer-matrix method, as well as a semi-empirical QCL model for predicting CW performance. The analysis reveals a device of significantly higher tolerance for fabrication errors, operating in a single-lobe beam pattern to 0.63 W CW, although the emitted power scales less efficiently with length than for symmetric-mode operating devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available