4.6 Article

Secretive Coded Caching With Shared Caches

Journal

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 2849-2853

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2021.3094405

Keywords

Servers; Libraries; Encoding; Indexes; Delays; Wireless communication; Prefetching; Coded caching; secretive coded caching; shared caches

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) of Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, through J. C. Bose National Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of secretive coded caching in shared cache setup where perfect secrecy is required is studied, and a secretively achievable coded caching scheme is proposed.
We consider the problem of secretive coded caching in a shared cache setup where the number of users accessing a particular helper cache is more than one, and every user can access exactly one helper cache. In secretive coded caching, the constraint of perfect secrecy must be satisfied. It requires that the users should not gain, either from their caches or from the transmissions, any information about the content of the files that they did not request from the server. In order to accommodate the secrecy constraint, our problem setup requires, in addition to a helper cache, a dedicated user cache of minimum capacity of 1 unit to every user. This is where our formulation differs from the original work on shared caches (Fundamental Limits of Coded Caching With Multiple Antennas, Shared Caches and Uncoded Prefetching by E. Parrinello, A. unsal and P. Elia in Trans. Inf. Theory, 2020). In this work, we propose a secretively achievable coded caching scheme with shared caches under centralized placement. When our scheme is applied to the dedicated cache setting, it matches the scheme by Ravindrakumar et al. (Private Coded Caching, in Trans. Inf. Forensics and Security, 2018).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available