4.5 Article

Quantitative estimates of impact induced crustal erosion during accretion and its influence on the Sm/Nd ratio of the Earth

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 363, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114412

Keywords

Cratering; Planetary formation; Cosmochemistry; Accretion; Abundances, interiors

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency(ANR project VolTerre) [ANR-14-CE33-0017-01]
  2. Institut Universitaire de France
  3. UnivEarthS Labex programme at Sorbonne Paris Cite [ANR-10LABX-0023, ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE33-0017] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This passage discusses the impact of collisional erosion on the composition of Earth and how it can provide information on the dynamical context of its formation. The composition of Earth's primitive mantle should be strictly chondritic, but there may be an excess of certain elements due to collisional erosion.
Dynamical scenarios of terrestrial planets formation involve strong perturbations of the inner part of the solar system by the giant-planets, leading to enhanced impact velocities and subsequent collisional erosion. We quantitatively estimate the effect of collisional erosion on the resulting composition of Earth, and estimate how it may provide information on the dynamical context of its formation. The composition of the Bulk Silicate Earth (BSE, Earths primitive mantle) for refractory and lithophile elements (RLE) should be strictly chondritic as these elements are not affected by volatile loss nor by core formation. However, an excess in Nd-142 compared to the Nd-144 has been emphasized in terrestrial samples compared to most measurements in chondrites. In that case, the Samarium/Neodymium (Sm/Nd) ratio could be roughly 6% higher in the BSE than in chondrites, as suggested from the Sm-146/Nd-142 isotope system (Boyet and Carlson, 2005). This proposed chemical offset could be the consequence of preferential collisional erosion of the crust during the late stages of Earths accretion, leaving a BSE enriched in Sm due to its lower incompatibility compared to Nd (O'Neill and Palme, 2008; Boujibar et al., 2015; Bonsor et al., 2015; Carter et al., 2015, 2018). However, if the present Nd-142 of the BSE arises from nucleosynthetic heterogeneities within the protoplanetary disk (Burkhardt et al., 2016; Bouvier and Boyet, 2016; Boyet et al., 2018), then the BSE has no excess in Sm compared to Nd and this hypothesis precludes any significant loss of relatively Nd-enriched component early in the Solar System. Here, we simulate and quantify the erosion of Earths crust in the context of Solar System formation scenarios, including the classical model and Grand Tack scenario that invokes orbital migration of Jupiter during the gaseous disk phase (Walsh et al., 2011; Raymond et al., 2018). We find that collisional erosion of the early crust is unlikely to explain the proposed superchondritic Sm/Nd ratio of the Earth for most simulations. Only Grand Tack simulations in which the last giant impact on Earth occurred later than 50 million years after the start of Solar System formation can account for this Sm/Nd ratio. This time frame is consistent with current cosmochemical and dynamical estimates of the Moon forming impact (Chyba, 1991; Walker, 2009; Touboul et al., 2007, 2009, 2015; Pepin and Porcelli, 2006; Norman et al., 2003; Nyquist et al., 2006; Boyet et al., 2015). However, such a late fractionation in the Sm/Nd ratio is unlikely to be responsible for a 20-ppm Nd-142 excess in terrestrial rocks due to the half life of the radiogenic system. Additionally, such a large and late fractionation in the Sm/Nd ratio would accordingly induce non-observed anomalies in the Nd-143/Nd-144 ratio. Considering our results, the Grand Tack model with a late Moon-forming impact cannot be easily reconciled with the Nd isotopic Earth contents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available