Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Applications of digital imaging and analysis in seabird monitoring and research
Alice J. Edney et al.
IBIS (2021)
Drone-conducted counts as a tool for the rapid assessment of productivity of Sandwich Terns (Thalasseus sandvicensis)
Roberto G. Valle et al.
JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY (2021)
Escape responses of terrestrial and aquatic birds to drones: Towards a code of practice to minimize disturbance
Mike Weston et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2020)
Drone Surveys Do Not Increase Colony-wide Flight Behaviour at Waterbird Nesting Sites, But Sensitivity Varies Among Species
Jared R. Barr et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)
A standardized protocol for reporting methods when using drones for wildlife research
Andrew F. Barnas et al.
JOURNAL OF UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS (2020)
Monitoring large and complex wildlife aggregations with drones
Mitchell B. Lyons et al.
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2019)
Drones improve effectiveness and reduce disturbance of censusing Common Redshanks Tringa totanus breeding on salt marshes
Roberto G. Valle et al.
ARDEA (2019)
Flights of drones over sub-Antarctic seabirds show species- and status-specific behavioural and physiological responses
Henri Weimerskirch et al.
POLAR BIOLOGY (2018)
How do you find the green sheep? A critical review of the use of remotely sensed imagery to detect and count animals
Tracey Hollings et al.
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2018)
Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans
Jarrod C. Hodgson et al.
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2018)
Detectability and visibility biases associated with using a consumer-grade unmanned aircraft to survey nesting colonial waterbirds
Jared R. Barr et al.
JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY (2018)
Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review
Margarita Mulero-Pazmany et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
Best practice for minimising unmanned aerial vehicle disturbance to wildlife in biological field research
Jarrod C. Hodgson et al.
CURRENT BIOLOGY (2016)
Computer-automated bird detection and counts in high-resolution aerial images: a review
Dominique Chabot et al.
JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY (2016)
Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: disturbance effects and species recognition
John F. McEvoy et al.
PEERJ (2016)
Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines
Elisabeth Vas et al.
BIOLOGY LETTERS (2015)
Population Census of a Large Common Tern Colony with a Small Unmanned Aircraft
Dominique Chabot et al.
PLoS One (2015)
Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology
Karen Anderson et al.
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (2013)
Fine-scale bird monitoring from light unmanned aircraft systems
Francesc Sarda-Palomera et al.
IBIS (2012)
An automatic counter for aerial images of aggregations of large birds
Stig Descamps et al.
BIRD STUDY (2011)
Using object-based analysis of image data to count birds: mapping of Lesser Flamingos at Kamfers Dam, Northern Cape, South Africa
Geoff Groom et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING (2011)
A new dawn for citizen science
Jonathan Silvertown
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2009)
QuickBird spots flamingos off Nalabana Island, Chilika Lake, India
S. K. Sasamal et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING (2008)
The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance
BA Walther et al.
ECOGRAPHY (2005)
Share Paper
