4.5 Article

Difference between morning and evening home blood pressure and cardiovascular events: the J-HOP Study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure)

Journal

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 1597-1605

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41440-021-00686-2

Keywords

Home blood pressure monitoring; morning minus evening systolic blood pressure difference; cardiovascular risk; general practice

Funding

  1. 21st Century Center of Excellence Project by Japan's Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT)
  2. Foundation for Development of the Community (Tochigi)
  3. Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd.
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [21390247]
  5. MEXT-supported program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities [S1101022]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21390247] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The higher difference in morning and evening home systolic blood pressure (MEdif: morning minus evening home SBP >= 20 mmHg) is associated with higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk compared to other MEdif groups. Those in both elevated MEave (>= 135 mmHg) and MEdif (>= 20 mmHg) groups have higher CVD risk compared to controlled groups. These findings suggest that monitoring MEdif in home BP can predict future CVD incidence.
Little is known about the relationship of the difference between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (BP) (MEdif) in home BP with cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence. To assess this relationship, we used data from the nationwide practice-based J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home BP) study, which recruited 4258 cardiovascular risk participants (mean age 64.9 years; 46.8% men; 79.2% using antihypertensive medications) who underwent morning and evening home BP monitoring using a validated, automated device for 14 consecutive days. During a mean +/- SD follow-up of 6.2 +/- 3.8 years (26,295 person-years), 269 CVD events occurred. Adjusted Cox models suggested that higher MEdif (>= 20 mmHg) was associated with higher CVD risks than was medium MEdif (0-20 mmHg) independent of the average morning and evening (MEave) home systolic BP (SBP) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.91). We also divided participants into four BP phenotype groups as follows: both non-elevated (MEdif < 20 mmHg and MEave SBP < 135 mmHg), elevated-MEdif (MEdif >= 20 mmHg and MEave SBP < 135 mmHg), elevated-MEave (MEdif < 20 mmHg and MEave SBP >= 135 mmHg), and both elevated (MEdif >= 20 mmHg and MEave SBP >= 135 mmHg). The cumulative incidence of CVD events was higher in patients with the elevated-MEdif, elevated-MEave, and both elevated phenotypes than in those with the both non-elevated phenotype. After adjusting for covariates, the both elevated phenotype was associated with higher CVD risk than the both non-elevated phenotype (adjusted HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.09-2.46). This is the first study demonstrating a direct correlation between CVD outcomes and the difference between morning and evening home SBP. The present study demonstrated that the higher difference of morning and evening home systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MEdif: morning minus evening home SBP >= 20 mmHg) was associated with higher total cardiovascular disease (CVD) events risk compared with other MEdif groups. After adjusting confounding factors and average of morning and evening home SBP (MEave), the higher MEdif group showed higher CVD risk compared with the normal MEdif group (0-20 mmHg) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.88). The both elevated MEave (>= 135 mmHg) and MEdif (>= 20 mmHg) groups were also associated with higher CVD risk compared to the both controlled groups (adjusted HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.10-2.47). From these findings, the higher MEdif in home BP monitoring was suggested to predict future CVD incidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available