4.5 Article

Evaluation of quantitative precipitation forecast in five Indian river basins

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL
Volume 66, Issue 15, Pages 2216-2231

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2021.1982138

Keywords

quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF); numerical weather prediction (NWP) model; forecast skill; NCMRWF; Indian river basins

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [CRG/2018/000649]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the performance of quantitative precipitation forecasts obtained from national and international agencies for streamflow forecasting, finding that the forecast accuracy of the national agency is comparable to that of the European agency. The results suggest that selecting accurate observation data is critical for forecast performance evaluation.
Quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) obtained from a numerical weather prediction model is used for streamflow forecasting. This study systematically evaluates the performance of a deterministic QPF obtained from a national agency, the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF), compared with that obtained from three international agencies. For observation/reference datasets, we used satellite, raingauge, and satellite-gauge merged data products. The forecast skill is evaluated for 177 sub-basins in Ganga, Narmada, Mahanadi, Tapti, and Godavari river basins. Our results indicate that the forecast accuracy of NCMRWF is closely comparable with that of QPF obtained from a European agency. We conclude that selecting accurate observation/reference data is critical for forecast performance evaluation. We determine the preferred forecast and reference datasets in the selected river basins. Our results suggest that for estimating the parameters of a post-processor, a comparable dataset can be used for which data are available for a longer duration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available