4.6 Article

Catchments of German surface water bodies

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14272

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Leibniz-Institut fur Gewasserokologie und Binnenfischerei Berlin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study established a network of 26,570 WB catchments in Germany based on hydrological-defined drainage basins of the federal states, with plausibility checks and validation. The network corrected geometric inaccuracies and proposed solutions for splitting and intersections.
The European Water Framework Directive demands to assess and report the chemical and ecological status of water bodies (WB). Linking their status to drivers and pressures and deriving suitable mitigation measures require knowledge of the shape and area of WB catchments. We derived a network of 26 570 WB catchments in Germany using the hydrologically-defined drainage basins of the German federal states. We established a network of 338 149 drainage basins. This network underwent plausibility checks and a validation with the catchment areas of 348 monitoring stations across Germany. To this network, we assigned the longest intersecting or the next downstream WB code. To account for geometric inaccuracies we revised spurious intersections resulting in splittings and cycles in the WB network. As WB may be ecologically but not hydrologically well defined, we split them at confluences and intersections. The network of drainage basins matched the monitoring stations with a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 1.00. The final WB network contained 11 005 out of the 11 586 original WBs longer than 1 m. The corresponding local catchment areas range from <<0.0001 to 446 km(2), with a median of 10 km(2). The dataset combines the requirements of hydrological and ecological modelling applications at basin or national scales with the needs of the EU reporting which can foster their acceptance by state authorities and river-basin management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available