Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The value of genomic sequencing in complex pediatric neurological disorders: a discrete choice experiment
Ilias Goranitis et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2021)
Demand for Precision Medicine: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and External Validation Study
Dean A. Regier et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2020)
Quality of life drives patients' preferences for secondary findings from genomic sequencing
Chloe Mighton et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2020)
How digital tools can advance quality and equity in genomic medicine
Yvonne Bombard et al.
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS (2020)
Association of Mobile Patient Portal Access With Diabetes Medication Adherence and Glycemic Levels Among Adults With Diabetes
Ilana Graetz et al.
JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2020)
The impact of variant classification on the clinical management of hereditary cancer syndromes
Scott A. Turner et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2019)
Development of patient profiles to tailor counseling for incidental genomic sequencing results
Chloe Mighton et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2019)
The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results
Yvonne Bombard et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2019)
Letter: Relearning the 3 R's? Reinterpretation, recontact, and return of genetic variants
Bartha Maria Knoppers et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2019)
Variant classification changes over time in BRCA1 and BRCA2
Chloe Mighton et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2019)
The All of Us Research Program
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2019)
Recontacting patients in clinical genetics services: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics
Daniele Carrieri et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2019)
Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Karen L. David et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2019)
Data sharing as a national quality improvement program: reporting on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant-interpretation comparisons through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR)
Matthew S. Lebo et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2018)
Parental preferences toward genomic sequencing for non-medically actionable conditions in children: a discrete-choice experiment
Megan A. Lewis et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2018)
Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic
Sarah Macklin et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2018)
The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results
Yvonne Bombard et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2018)
Prevalence of Variant Reclassification Following Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing
Jacqueline Mersch et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)
Preference heterogeneity with respect to whole genome sequencing. A discrete choice experiment among parents of children with rare genetic diseases
Christine Peyron et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2018)
Implications of Patient Portal Transparency in Oncology: Qualitative Interview Study on the Experiences of Patients, Oncologists, and Medical Informaticists
Jordan M. Alpert et al.
JMIR CANCER (2018)
Recontacting in clinical practice: the views and expectations of patients in the United Kingdom
Daniele Carrieri et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2017)
Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
Daniele Carrieri et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2017)
A 'joint venture' model of recontacting in clinical genomics: challenges for responsible implementation
Sandi Dheensa et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS (2017)
Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software
Emily Lancsar et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2017)
Clinical genome sequencing and population preferences for information about 'incidental' findings D From medically actionable genes (MAGs) to patient actionable genes (PAGs)
Thomas Ploug et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research
Carmel Bradshaw et al.
GLOBAL QUALITATIVE NURSING RESEARCH (2017)
A systematic review of the reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments in valuing non-market environmental goods
O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2016)
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force
A. Brett Hauber et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2016)
Patients' Preferences for Genomic Diagnostic Testing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: A Discrete Choice Experiment
James Buchanan et al.
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2016)
Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared
Mattijs S. Lambooij et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2015)
Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment
Dean A. Regier et al.
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2015)
Value judgments for priority setting criteria in genetic testing: A discrete choice experiment
Franziska Severin et al.
HEALTH POLICY (2015)
Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature
Ellen Otten et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2015)
Empirical Testing of the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Determine Preferred Treatment Option: The Case of Sleep Apnea
Nicolas Krucien et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2015)
The Predictive Value of Discrete Choice Experiments in Public Health: An Exploratory Application
Benjamin H. Salampessy et al.
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2015)
Availability of treatment drives decisions of genetic health professionals about disclosure of incidental findings
Erin Turbitt et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2014)
Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value-development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT)
Caroline Savage Bennette et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2013)
Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs-Principles and Practices
Michael D. Fetters et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2013)
Decision-Makers' Preferences for Approving New Medicines in Wales: A Discrete-Choice Experiment with Assessment of External Validity
Warren G. Linley et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2013)
Women and their partners' preferences for Down's syndrome screening tests: a discrete choice experiment
Fran E. Carroll et al.
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS (2013)
Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force
F. Reed Johnson et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2013)
Non-trading, lexicographic and inconsistent behaviour in stated choice data
Stephane Hess et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT (2010)
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review
Craig Mitton et al.
HEALTH POLICY (2009)
Identification of parameters in normal error component logit-mixture (NECLM) models
Joan L. Walker et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS (2007)
A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures
Arne Risa Hole
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2007)
Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood
Arne Risa Hole
STATA JOURNAL (2007)
What influences participation in genetic carrier testing? Results from a discrete choice experiment
Jane Hall et al.
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2006)
Using stated preference modeling to forecast the effect of medication attributes on prescriptions of alcoholism medications
TL Mark et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2003)
Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: An application to HIV testing
KA Phillips et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2002)
Share Paper
