4.5 Article

Work-Related Risk Factors for Rotator Cuff Syndrome in a Prospective Study of Manufacturing and Healthcare Workers

Journal

HUMAN FACTORS
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 419-434

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00187208211022122

Keywords

shoulder pain; ergonomics; occupational diseases; musculoskeletal diseases; rotator cuff tendinopathy; rotator cuff syndrome; work-related factors; posture; repetition; incidence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This prospective study assessed the risk of developing rotator cuff syndrome (RCS) with different biomechanical exposures, and found that increased risk of RCS was associated with forceful hand exertions and upper arm postures. The study highlights the importance of evaluating these factors in preventing RCS.
Objective This prospective study assessed the risk of developing rotator cuff syndrome (RCS) with separate or specific combinations of biomechanical exposures measures, controlling for individual confounders. Background Compared with other musculoskeletal disorders, rates of work-related shoulder musculoskeletal disorders have been declining more slowly. Method We conducted up to 2 years of individual, annual assessments of covariates, exposures, and health outcomes for 393 U.S. manufacturing and healthcare workers without RCS at baseline. Task-level biomechanical exposures assessed exposure to forceful exertions (level, exertion rates, duty cycles), vibration, and upper arm postures (flexion, abduction). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with Cox proportional hazard models. Results We observed 39 incident RCS cases in 694 person-years (incidence rate = 5.62 per 100 person-years). Adjusting for confounders, we found increased risk of incident RCS associated with forceful hand exertions per minute for three upper arm posture tertiles: flexion >= 45 degrees (>= 28.2% time, HR = 1.11, CI [1.01, 1.22]), abduction >= 30 degrees (11.9-21.2%-time, HR = 1.18, CI [1.04, 1.34]), and abduction >60 degrees (>= 4.8% time, HR = 1.16, CI [1.04, 1.29]). We failed to observe statistically significant effects for other interactions or any separate measures of biomechanical exposure. Conclusion This study highlights the importance of assessing combinations of exposure to forceful repetition and upper arm elevation when developing interventions for preventing RCS. Application Based on these results, interventions that reduce exposure to forceful repetition (i.e., lower force levels and/or slower exertion rates) may reduce the risk of RCS, especially when upper arm elevation cannot be avoided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available