4.8 Article

The viral hepatitis B care cascade: A population-based comparison of immigrant groups

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 673-689

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.32162

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-103553]
  2. Canadian Hepatitis C Research Network (CanHepC)
  3. Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)
  4. Public Health Ontario
  5. ICES - Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)
  6. CIHR [NHC-142832]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed data on the care cascade of hepatitis B and found that immigrants had better rates of diagnosis and engagement with care compared to long-term residents, although intensified screening efforts and better strategies to facilitate linkage to care are still needed.
Background and Aims The global burden of viral hepatitis B is substantial, and monitoring infections across the care cascade is important for elimination efforts. There is little information on care disparities by immigration status, and we aimed to quantify disease burden among immigrant subgroups. Approach and Results In this population-based, retrospective cohort study, we used linked laboratory and health administrative records to describe the HBV care cascade in five distinct stages: (1) lifetime prevalence; (2) diagnosis; (3) engagement with care; (4) treatment initiation; and (5) treatment continuation. Infections were identified based on at least one reactive antigen or nucleic acid test, and lifetime prevalence was estimated as the sum of diagnosed and estimated undiagnosed cases. Care cascades were compared between long-term residents and immigrant groups, including subgroups born in hepatitis B endemic countries. Stratified analyses and multivariable Poisson regression were used to identify drivers for cascade progression. Between January 1997 and December 2014, 2,014,470 persons were included, 50,475 with infections, of whom 30,118 were engaged with care, 11,450 initiated treatment, and 6554 continued treatment >1 year. Lifetime prevalence was estimated as 163,309 (1.34%) overall, 115,722 (3.42%) among all immigrants, and 50,876 (9.37%) among those from highly endemic countries. Compared to long-term residents, immigrants were more likely to be diagnosed (adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 4.55; 95% CI, 4.46, 4.63), engaged with care (aRR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04, 1.09), and initiate treatment (aRR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.16). Conclusions In conclusion, immigrants fared well compared to long-term residents along the care cascade, having higher rates of diagnosis and slightly better measures in subsequent cascade stages, although intensified screening efforts and better strategies to facilitate linkage to care are still needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available