4.6 Article

Computational homogenisation from a 3D finite element model of asphalt concrete-linear elastic computations

Journal

FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages 43-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2015.10.005

Keywords

Asphalt concrete; Random heterogeneous media; Representative volume element; Voronoi tessellation; Computational homogenisation; Finite element method

Funding

  1. German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) [FE 07.0264/2012/ARB]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asphalt concrete (AC) is a composite material consisting of bituminous binders, mineral aggregate, and voids. Experimental and computational efforts to assess the bulk mechanical properties of AC ubiquitously raise the question of representative sample size. It is well known that the dimension of a sample has to be larger than the largest morphological entity. However, it has been shown that the required size is a function of the morphological and physical properties under consideration, e.g. the difference between the properties of the constituents at the microscale, and their volume fractions. In the present contribution, representative sample sizes are determined numerically for a variation of parameters in terms of a tolerable amount of statistical scatter by conducting virtual experiments. If the scatter between distinct heterogeneous samples falls below a certain threshold, the corresponding volume is called a representative volume element (RVE). Finite element (FE) discretisations of AC volume samples are generated by means of a shrunk Poisson Voronoi tessellation. In order to provide estimates for the evolution of the RVE size under changing material properties of the mortar, the stiffness ratio between rocks and mortar is varied by two orders of magnitude. Furthermore, the influence of a variation in volume fraction is investigated. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available