4.4 Article

Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure

Journal

HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6

Keywords

Needs assessment; Heart failure; Palliative care; Patient-centered care; NAT; PD-HF

Funding

  1. Stiftung Lindenhof Bern, Teaching and Research Fund
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant, through the SSPH +Global PhD Fellowship Program in Public Health Sciences (GlobalP3HS) of the Swiss School of Public Health [801076]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study translated and culturally adapted the NAT: PD-HF tool into German, and evaluated its internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, and validity. Results showed good internal consistency of the translated tool, substantial agreement among raters for most questions, and high face validity rating by health care personnel.
Background: The Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure (NAT: PD-HF) is a tool created to assess the needs of people living with heart failure and their informal caregivers to assist delivering care in a more comprehensive way that addresses actual needs that are unmet, and to improve quality of life. In this study, we aimed to (1) Translate the tool into German and culturally adapt it. (2) Assess internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability of the German NAT: PD-HF. (3) Evaluate whether and how patients and health care personnel understand the tool and its utility. (4) Assess the tool's face validity, applicability, relevance, and acceptability among health care personnel. Methods: Single-center validation study. The tool was translated from English into German using a forward-backward translation. To assess internal consistency, we used Cronbach's alpha. To assess inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability, we used Cohen's kappa, and to assess validity we used face validity. Results: The translated tool showed good internal consistency. Raters were in substantial agreement on a majority of the questions, and agreement was almost perfect for all the questions in the test-retest analysis. Face validity was rated high by health care personnel. Conclusion: The German NAT: PD-HF is a reliable, valid, and internally consistent tool that is well accepted by both patients and health care personnel. However, it is important to keep in mind that effective use of the tool requires training of health care personnel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available