4.5 Article

Differential diagnoses of solitary and multiple pigmented lesions of the oral mucosa: Evaluation of 905 specimens submitted to histopathological examination

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hed.26872

Keywords

diagnosis; melanocytes; melanoma; mouth mucosa; nevus; pigmentation

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [001]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
  4. Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the clinical and demographic features of oral pigmented lesions, finding that solitary lesions are more common and summarizing the clinical differential diagnosis features, including age, site, and appearance characteristics.
Background The aim was to analyze the frequency, clinical and demographic features of solitary and multiple/diffuse oral pigmented lesions submitted to histopathological examination, and to summarize the features that guide the clinical differential diagnosis. Methods Clinical and demographic data were retrieved from biopsy records and descriptive statistics were performed. Results Nine hundred and five (0.51%) oral pigmented lesions were retrieved among 177 356 specimens, being 95.9% solitary and 4.1% multiple/diffuse lesions. Regardless the overlapping clinical presentation, age, site, association with amalgam restoration, and a nodular appearance may help in the clinical differential diagnosis of solitary oral pigmentations. Patient's habits, site, and systemic signs and symptoms are helpful in the clinical differential diagnosis of multiple/diffuse lesions. Conclusions Oral pigmented lesions are a rare diagnosis in oral pathology and solitary lesions are more commonly submitted to biopsy. Some key features help in the differential diagnosis, though biopsy can be warranted in doubtful cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available