Journal
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 53-55Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hast.1288
Keywords
triage; medical decision-making; political decision-making; crisis standards of care (CSC); Covid-19 pandemic; mortality rates; doctor-patient relationship
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The article describes the inclusion of triage algorithms and other strategies in crisis standards of care plans, sparking vigorous debates on prioritizing patient survival predictions and values like equity in triage protocols. While the development of CSC triage protocols is based in medicine, public health, and ethics, the activation of CSC plans is ultimately a political decision.
As described in two articles in the September-October 2021 issue of the Hastings Center Report, most crisis standards of care (CSC) plans include triage algorithms to guide the allocation of critical care resources to some patients and not others under conditions of extreme scarcity. The plans also include other important CSC strategies, but it is the notion of rationing scarce resources via triage that especially captured the imaginations of ethicists. Vigorous arguments have arisen over whether triage algorithms should be designed to prioritize patients based on predictions of short-, near-, or long-term survival. Additionally, there are ongoing debates about the ability of current algorithms to estimate patient survival accurately enough to be useful in triage and about the role of values like equity in triage protocols. Relatively few debates have noted, however, that while the development of CSC triage protocols has been based in medicine, public health, and ethics, the activation of CSC plans remains a political decision.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available