4.3 Review

Maternal adropin levels in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 105-109

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2021.1963703

Keywords

Adropin; gestational diabetes mellitus; meta-analysis; insulin resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The meta-analysis showed that maternal serum/plasma adropin levels were significantly higher in GDM patients compared to non-GDM controls. Sensitivity analysis revealed that no individual study significantly influenced the overall outcome.
Background Adropin is a regulatory protein with potential implications in energy homeostasis, glucose regulation, and insulin resistance. Aim The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the maternal serum/plasma adropin levels between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients and non-GDM controls. Methods Relevant studies were retrieved by online database and manual searching. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by a random-effects meta-analysis. A one-study leave-out sensitivity analysis and trimester-wise subgroup analysis were performed. Results A total of eight observations were included in this meta-analysis. The results based on random-effects meta-analysis indicated that adropin levels were significantly increased in GDM patients as compared to non-GDM controls (SMD = 2.41, 95% CI = 0.52-4.29, p= .01). The sensitivity analysis indicated that no single study had significantly influenced the overall outcome. Conclusions The results indicate that maternal serum/plasma adropin concentrations were significantly higher in GDM patients as compared to non-GDM controls suggesting the potential associations of adropin in GDM. Despite this, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanistic, diagnostic and prognostic roles of trimester-wise adropin levels in GDM and associated fetal outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available