4.4 Article

Long-term success treating inflammatory epiretinal neovascularization with immunomodulatory therapy

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05396-6

Keywords

Optic disc neovascularization; Retinal neovascularization; Uveitis; Immunomodulatory therapy; Inflammatory eye disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the long-term outcomes of uveitis-associated optic disc and epiretinal neovascularization treated with immunomodulatory therapy alone, showing successful resolution of uveitic neovascularization without recurrence.
Purpose This study aims to report the long-term outcomes of uveitis-associated optic disc and epiretinal neovascularization (NV) treated with immunomodulatory therapy alone. Methods This is a retrospective, multi-center chart review conducted at Northwestern University (Chicago, IL) and San Raffaele Scientific Institute (Milan, Italy) from 2014 to 2021 of patients with optic disc and/or retinal neovascularization associated with uveitis. The data collected included age at the time of NV detection, gender, medications, and follow-up period. Imaging was reviewed if available. Results Eight eyes of six patients were identified. The mean age was 22 years (range 10-52 years); the median follow-up was 3 years (range 6 months to 7 years). All eyes presented with active NV at the time of uveitis onset; 7 eyes were treatment-naive. None had clinical or angiographic evidence of retinal ischemia. All patients received a variable combination of local steroids, systemic steroids, and systemic immunosuppression. Complete resolution of uveitic NV occurred in all eyes within a median of 8 weeks (ranging 2-20 weeks) from initiating treatment. No NV recurrence was noted. Conclusion Immunomodulatory therapy alone may be successful in achieving long-term control of uveitis-associated NV, without the use of destructive measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available