4.7 Article

Climate change action as a project of identity: Eight meta-analyses

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102322

Keywords

Identity; Climate change mitigation; Climate-friendly behavior; Social identity; Place identity; Connectedness to nature; Environmental identity; Pro-environmental behavior

Funding

  1. EU, ECHOES project [727470]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research shows that people's connectedness to nature, environmental self-identity, and identification with groups supporting climate-friendly behavior are strongly linked to pro-environmental intentions and behaviors, while identification with groups unrelated to the environment and place identity have weaker effects.
Identity can improve our understanding of personal climate action, particularly when climate action becomes an expression of a person's self. However, it is unclear which kind of self or identity is most relevant. Building on a comprehensive series of eight meta-analyses (using data from 188 published articles, N = 414,282 participants) this research systematically compares how strongly climate-friendly intentions and behaviors are associated with place identity, personal connectedness to nature, environmental self-identity (i.e., personal self-definition as a pro-environmentally acting person), and social identity (i.e., identification with social groups). Results suggest robust, medium-sized to strong links of both pro-environmental intentions and behaviors to people's nature connectedness (r = 0.44/0.52), environmental self-identity (r = 0.62/0.56), and identification with groups considered to support climate-friendly behavior (r = 0.48/0.51), but markedly weaker effects for identification with groups which are unrelated to environmental topics (r = 0.30/0.15) and for place identity (r = 0.18/0.32). Implications for policy interventions and psychological theory are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available