4.5 Article

On the symmetry properties of the network of thermal resistances representing the thermal response of slender geothermal boreholes

Journal

GEOTHERMICS
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102078

Keywords

Geothermal heat exchangers; Geothermal boreholes; Unsteady heat conduction; Network of thermal resistances; Symmetry and asymmetry; Green's function

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [ENE201568703C22R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the symmetries and asymmetries in theoretical models for the unsteady thermal response of geothermal boreholes, providing mathematical proofs for the breakdown of some symmetries when considering additional factors such as thermal inertias of grout and surrounding ground. This research also identifies and proves other symmetries and asymmetries in the network of thermal resistances for which proofs are lacking in existing literature.
Most theoretical models for the unsteady ->thermal response of geothermal boreholes include a network of thermal resistances that provides the heat injection rates per unit pipe length of the different pipes inside the borehole in terms of the fluid temperatures in those pipes and of the thermal response of the ground surrounding the borehole. That network presents certain symmetries that are well known in the research field. However, when the thermal inertias of the grout and of the ground located close to the borehole are taken into account, for example through the enhanced multipole method recently developed by the authors, some of these symmetries break down. The present work provides mathematical proofs for this break down as well as for other symmetries and asymmetries present in the network of thermal resistances and for which no proofs exist in the prevailing literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available