4.7 Article

Role of the Solar Minimum in the Waiting Time Distribution Throughout the Heliosphere

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL094348

Keywords

waiting time; solar flare; substorm; storm; coronal mass ejection; power law

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX15AJ01G, NNH15AB17I, NNX16AQ87G, 80NSSC19K0270, 80NSSC19K0843, 80NSSC18K0835, 80NSSC20K0355, NNX17AI50G, NNX17AI47G, 80HQTR18T0066, 80NSSC20K0704]
  2. NSF [AGS1832207, AGS1602855]
  3. Andrews University [FRG 201119]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that the distribution of large waiting times in random processes driven by the solar activity cycle exhibits a power law slope; the waiting time distributions of solar flares, CMEs, geomagnetic storms, and substorms tend towards a power law distribution; the waiting time distribution of substorms during solar minimum may be influenced by prolonged periods of weak driving.
Many processes throughout the heliosphere such as flares, coronal mass ejections (CMEs), storms and substorms have abrupt onsets. The waiting time between these onsets provides key insights as to the underlying dynamical processes. We explore the tail of these waiting time distributions (WTDs) in the context of random processes driven by the solar magnetic activity cycle, which we approximate by a sinusoidal driver. Analytically, we find that the distribution of large waiting times of such a process approaches a power law slope of -2.5, which is primarily controlled by the conditions when the driving is minimum. We find that the asymptotic behavior of WTDs of solar flares, CMEs, geomagnetic storms, and substorms exhibit power laws that are in reasonable agreement with a sinusoidally driven nonstationary Poisson process. However, the WTD of substorms during solar minimum may be more consistent with prolonged periods of weak driving followed by abrupt increase in the rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available