4.7 Article

Insights on Space-Leader Characteristics and Evolution in Natural Negative Cloud-to-Ground Lightning

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL093614

Keywords

lightning; space leader; cloud-to-ground lightning; stepped-leader; peak current; high-speed video camera observations

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation Award [1934066]
  2. U.S. Air Force [FA252117P0079]
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1934066] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study presents high-speed video camera observations of three negative stepped leaders in cloud-to-ground lightning flashes, showing that the characteristics of space leaders are likely influenced by stepped-leader line-charge-density, possibly evolving differently in flashes with higher return-stroke peak currents.
We present sub-microsecond-scale, high-speed video camera observations of three negative stepped leaders in cloud-to-ground flashes with return-stroke peak currents (estimated by the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network) of -17, -104, and -228 kA. The camera frame exposure times for these observations were 1.8, 1.0, and 0.74 mu s, respectively. The 0.74 mu s exposure time is the shortest reported to date. We observed the temporal and spatial evolution of space leaders from their inception to their attachment to the pre-existing leader channel (PELC). For stepped leaders that led to return strokes having higher peak currents, the space leaders appear to have incepted at farther median two-dimensional distances from their respective PELC-attachment points. These median distances were 6.1, 16.6, and 17.6 m, respectively, for the three strokes. Our observations indicate that space leader characteristics are likely influenced by stepped-leader line-charge-density, which is expected to be higher in strokes with higher return-stroke peak currents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available