4.7 Article

Are Xenoliths From Southwestern Kaapvaal Craton Representative of the Broader Mantle? Constraints From Magnetotelluric Modeling

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL092570

Keywords

craton; kaapvaal; kimberlite; lithospheric mantle; magnetotelluric; xenolith

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [FT150100541]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT150100541] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that water content decreases with depth in the southwestern Kaapvaal Craton, broadly matching the distribution of metasomatism. While most water content measurements from xenolith samples agree with the models, discrepancies suggest a local metasomatic control over xenolith water contents.
Most of our knowledge of the composition and water content of the cratonic mantle comes from xenoliths found in alkaline magmatic rocks (e.g., kimberlites). However, it is debatable whether such mantle-xenolith samples are representative of the mantle over larger lateral extents or only represent more local metasomatized conduits. To investigate this, we made 3D deterministic and 1D probabilistic models of magnetotelluric (MT) data from the southwestern Kaapvaal Craton and carried out quantitative interpretations. The results indicate that water content decreases with depth between 100 and 160 km, broadly matching the distribution of metasomatism inferred from garnet-xenocrysts. Spatially pervasive phlogopite could exist for a colder geotherm (37 mW/m(2)) whereas it is not required for the more likely geotherm of 40.2 mW/m(2). Most water contents measured from xenolith samples agree with those calculated from the MT models within error, but the discrepancies between them suggest a local metasomatic control over xenolith water contents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available