4.7 Article

Evaluation of Atmospheric 3-Day Waves as a Source of Day-to-Day Variation of the Ionospheric Longitudinal Structure

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL094877

Keywords

tides; planetary waves; wave interaction; upper atmosphere; ion neutral connection; equatorial ionosphere

Funding

  1. NASA's Explorers Program [NNG12FA45C, NNG12FA42I]
  2. NASA [NNG12FA45C]
  3. National Center for Atmospheric Research - National Science Foundation [1852977]
  4. [NNH20ZDA001N-LWS]
  5. [80NSSC18K0649]
  6. [80NSSC20K1323]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports for the first time the day-to-day variation of the longitudinal structure in height of the F-2 layer (h(m)F(2) in the equatorial ionosphere, and reveals a similar to 3-day modulation and planetary wave activity. These variations are likely caused by the planetary wave-tide interaction.
We report for the first time the day-to-day variation of the longitudinal structure in height of the F-2 layer (h(m)F(2)) in the equatorial ionosphere using multi-satellite observations of electron density profiles by the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate-2 (COSMIC-2). These observations reveal a similar to 3-day modulation of the h(m)F(2) wavenumber-4 structure viewed in a fixed local time frame during January 30-February 14, 2021. Simultaneously, similar to 3-day planetary wave activity is discerned from zonal wind observations at similar to 100 km by the Ionospheric Connection Explorer (ICON) Michelson Interferometer for Global High-Resolution Thermospheric Imaging (MIGHTI). This signature is not observed at similar to 180-250 km altitudes, suggesting the dissipation of this wave below the F-region. We propose that the 3-day variation identified in h(m)F(2) is likely caused by the planetary wave-tide interaction through the E-region dynamo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available