4.7 Article

Measurements of the Diversity of Shape and Mixing State for Ambient Black Carbon Particles

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL094522

Keywords

black carbon; particle morphology; dynamic shape factor; mixing state

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0602001, 2019YFC0214703]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41875167, 41875044, 41975180]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantified the dynamic shape of ambient BC-containing particles for the first time by measuring the electrical mobility diameter and optical volume-equivalent diameter; particles in urban Beijing with larger rBC cores showed higher non-sphericity and dynamic shape factor; a chi-VR space was proposed to describe particle shape and include all ambient quantified BC morphologies in optical models.
The complex particle morphology of black carbon (BC) induces considerable uncertainties in constraining its optical properties. In particular, the diversity of how the BC core and coating are combined is yet to be resolved due to the lack of direct ambient quantification. In this study, by concurrent measurements of the electrical mobility diameter (D-m) and optical volume-equivalent diameter (D-ve), the dynamic shape factor (chi = D-m/D-ve) of ambient BC-containing particles at different mixing states was quantified for the first time. BC in urban Beijing showed a widely distributed chi of 1.4 +/- 0.43. Particles with larger refractory BC (rBC) cores showed higher non-sphericity and higher chi. A ten-fold increase in the volume ratio of the coating over rBC (VR) could decrease the fraction of fractal BC by 36%. This study proposed a chi-VR space to describe the particle shape, which is able to include all ambient quantified BC morphologies in optical model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available