4.7 Article

Combined Effects of Global Warming and Ozone Depletion/Recovery on Southern Hemisphere Atmospheric Circulation and Regional Precipitation

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL092568

Keywords

ozone depletion; recovery; global warming; tug-of-war; stratospheric polar vortex; storyline approach

Funding

  1. ACRCC
  2. ERC [339390]
  3. CLIMAX [Belmont Forum/ANR-15-JCL/-0002-01]
  4. University of Buenos Aires
  5. UBACyT [20020130100489BA]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [339390] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between global warming and ozone depletion/recovery has complex effects on Southern Hemisphere circulation and precipitation changes. At the regional scale, the combined effects of other remote drivers of circulation change are more important than the influence of ozone and global warming.
Ozone depletion led to a positive trend in the summertime Southern Annular Mode (SAM) during the last decades of the 20th century. During the present century, global warming (GW) is expected to contribute to a positive SAM trend while ozone recovery is expected to act in the opposite direction. Here, Southern Hemisphere (SH) circulation and regional precipitation change are studied with a methodology that separates the effects from GW and ozone depletion/recovery. Our results show that a tug-of-war between ozone and GW occurs in the summertime stratosphere, propagating to the troposphere where it is manifest in the SAM. However, at the regional scale this tug-of-war is not as relevant as the combined effects of other remote drivers of circulation change, which force different kinds of precipitation changes in the SH. For regional precipitation changes, the uncertainty in future circulation change is as important as the uncertainty in the GW level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available