4.7 Article

Stratigraphic Evidence for Early Martian Explosive Volcanism in Arabia Terra

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL094109

Keywords

CRISM; CTX; DEM; Mars; supereruption; volcanic ash

Funding

  1. Mars Data Analysis Program [80NSSC19K0044]
  2. Goddard Graduate Student Intern Program
  3. APL's Student Program to Inspire, Relate, and Enrich (ASPIRE)
  4. NASA [80GSFC17M0002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research suggests that the large paterae in Arabia Terra were calderas from supereruptions, with extensive ash deposits found throughout the region. The presence of altered volcanic ash deposits, thinning away from the suggested calderas, indicates multiple explosive eruptions over 500 million years. The observations support the hypothesis of supereruptions in Arabia Terra during the late Noachian-early Hesperian period.
Several large paterae in Arabia Terra are suggested to be calderas that produced colossal explosive eruptions (i.e., supereruptions). If these features are indeed explosive calderas, dispersion modeling suggests extensive ash deposits should be common throughout the region. However, such deposits have not previously been linked with the suggested calderas. Here, we describe layered deposits containing minerals both consistent with and diagnostic of altered volcanic ash throughout Arabia Terra. These deposits include Al-dominant minerals such as montmorillonite, imogolite, and allophane among others. Altered ash deposits are found to thin (from 1-km to 100-m thickness) away from the suggested calderas. We estimate that the volcanic ash observed in Arabia Terra is the result of between 1,000 and 2,000 individual explosive eruptions over 500-million years. Our observations support the hypothesis that Arabia Terra hosted supereruptions in the late Noachian-early Hesperian that repeatedly blanketed the region with layers of ash.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available